Rewards trial voucher PM, wife

KUALA LUMPUR, March 24 - Even the House of Commons week shocked the first shock, this shift Zulkifli Noordin (Independent Kulim-Bandar Baharu) is making political disclosure shook the country.

He never claimed to be given by the lucrative offer for a particular associate of Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and his wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor in the murder case of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Without exposing the parties, he said, between his duties is to obtain recognition from the Prime Minister's oath and his wife requested a letter other than sworn declaration that Najib and Rosmah involved in the massacre.

Zulkifli said the reward was offered to shake his faith, but so thankful that God protect them from defamation is involved with. "For this reason I also withdrew from directly handling the case because of interference from third parties that cause impossible for me to continue to act professionally as a lawyer to defend the case.

"We need to remember Mudjiono October to October (be the companion) is willing to go to the rope hanging true if the Prime Minister and his wife are involved in the murder case because I believe very sure they will expose the matter if it is true," he said.

He stated that the current debate on the motion carrying you titah Yang di-Pertuan Agong at the House of Commons session today.

Wednesday last, Zahrain Datuk Seri Mohamed Hashim (Independent-Bayan Baru) rocked the conference when the House of Commons' break tembelang 'Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to take over government plans relating Center '16 September'.

Zulkifli also asserted that, as Muslims of all parties should mean good or husnuzzan of Prime Minister.

"The Prime Minister has one year I made an oath denying his involvement and so far there among us who dare to swear denied.

"So, fellow suspect okay and we hold fast to the Quran. How we do not like slandered people, so too we should not malign others, "he said.

In the meantime, he said, he was very surprised how few who professed Islam but easily accuse a Muslim to another murder without any proof and evidence.

"The more unfortunate slander non-Muslims can be admitted as evidence without any further questions. People such as P. Balasubramanian has been received with fitnahnya just make an oath with the certificate payment RM4.

"However slander and accusations never raised CPP when giving evidence in court and to the police. To me he is only an opportunist who takes advantage of human greed bertopengkan devil, "he added.

At that conference the House, Zulkifli also revealed he had asked to associate the child to the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz Nadim named in a murder case around 2004.

"I do not forget around 2004, when I asked to associate the Honorable Padang Rengas use with Darren Kang murder cases where the child named Honorable Nadim accused involved in the murder because the murder happened at the location.

"Meanwhile, five people, namely employees Thailand Restaurant Uncle Don in Sri Hartamas was later indicted, tried and certify guilty in the High Court of Kuala Lumpur. I have asked Nadim associate with them, "he said.

As benedictory, Zulkifli said, God once again saved from the trial.

He said, he has also directed and required to perform many things not right that is between made not.

"I take this opportunity to apologize to those who become victims of this dirty politics count. I promise to meet with them personally to correct the situation, "he said.

Zulkifli reminded the parties not to put them in certain circumstances forced him to disclose the wrong behavior occurs.

"If I do so, a large explosion made by the Honorable Bayan Baru, Datuk Seri Mohamed Hashim Zahrain simply 'the quiet wind. Such political his dirty toys this time, "he added.

Caning Women - Islam or Politics*

Many have asked as to why I wrote, ‘Isu Sebatan – Islam atau Politik’ in Bahasa Malaysia [“BM”] rather than English. There are 2 reasons for this. Firstly, there are many other more capable writers who can express the same issues (and who have done so) in English. Secondly (and more importantly), writing in English feels like preaching to the converted. My main intention was to provide some fodder for thought to the BM only readers out there. The same target audience that is being constantly fed with misinformation by the mainstream BM media. The audience that forms the bulk of the voter bank in Malaysia and who have the power to shape the country whether the rest of us like it or not. Unfortunately for those who prefer BM (either by choice or not), the alternative media does not provide as many write ups or coverage to balance off the onslaught of misinformation by the mainstream media. Hence the reason the article was written in BM.

I have also received a few ‘critical’ observations on the article. The main criticism is that I am looking at Syariah in the perspective of a western trained civil lawyer and as such I may not understand the intricacies of the laws. I disagree with that observation. I have dealt with the sections in the relevant Acts as it is drafted. I am not looking as to whether it is right or wrong or taking into account the Quran or Sunnah. I also believe that the accepted principles of natural justice are compatible with Islam. General maxims of natural justice like, ‘audi alteram partem’ (the right to be heard), ‘nemo judex causa sua’ (nobody shall be a judge in their own cause) and the concept of justice must be seen to be done are universal principles. The article I wrote merely highlight the circumstances surrounding the revelation by the Home Minister and the apparent flaws pertaining to the sentencing in light of the very same enactments used.

There is also the issue of the manner in which the enactments have been drafted. See section 23 subsection (3) and (4) on the presumptions that can be made without there being express fail safe mechanism to prevent the risk of injustice. It is scary to say the least.

The translation comes with slight changes to suit the language. Please take note that I have used the word ‘caning’ and ‘whipping’ interchangeably. The media have used ‘caning’ whilst the English version of the Act in question uses the word ‘whipping’. Here goes…..

The revelation by the Home Minister on the caning carried out on 3 women for the offence of sexual intercourse out of wedlock pursuant to section 23 of the Syariah Criminal Offences (Federal Territories) Act 1997 [“Act”] has resulted in the creation of another ‘controversial’ issue for the Malaysian public. This is unfortunately just one of the many ‘controversial’ issues which have cropped up in recent times with all sharing a common recurring theme; it will be politicized to the hilt by the powers-that-be.

This new issue relating to the 3 women is no different. There have been many questions which have not been answered, among others,

  1. Why did the Home Minister disclose the caning to the general public after it had been carried out when it is general knowledge that this issue has caused uneasiness when Kartika was sentenced to be caned.
  2. Why the Syariah Court is so determined to use the Act to cane these women when the same Act has a section on Liwat (sodomy) which was not used on Anwar Ibrahim?
  3. Does the Syariah Court have the power to impose such a punishment when the Penal Code expressly provides that women cannot be subject to caning (no matter how it is carried out)?
  4. Did the Syariah Court impose the caning sentence purposely to demonstrate that it does have the ‘power’ to do so and as such at par with the Civil Courts despite the fact that the general consensus is that the Syariah Courts are a subsidiary branch of the judiciary under the Constitution?
  5. Was the caning done on purpose to show that the government is more ‘Islamic’ than PAS and at the same time to bait the opposition to criticise the punishment so as to make it easier to label them ‘anti-Islam’ as how it was done for the ‘Allah’ issue and the Prophet’s birthday march?

For me, based on the conduct by the religious authorities under the control of the central government recently, it is very difficult to accept that the caning of the 3 women was done based on Islam (in the true and honest sense) and not merely another ‘move’ in the political chess game by utilising the Islamic institutions. If it was based solely on Islam in the true sense, I am sure that the Syarie Lawyers Association or the Council of Muftis would have not kept silent when Anwar Ibrahim was charged in the Criminal Courts when there is a clear and express provision relating to the exact offence in the Act.

To further support the theory that the caning was merely a political manoeuvre utilising Islam, lets look at the offence committed by the 3 women. From the media coverage, the facts as we know it are as follows:

a. The 3 women were caned when they were found guilty under section 23(2) of the Act;

b. The Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom said that, “They showed remorse as they felt that the punishment released them from sin and the feeling of guilt towards Allah S.W.T.,”

c. One of the women is 17 and was pregnant when she was still in school;

d. A second woman said she had to support her family after her father left home and had a three-year-old daughter out of wedlock.

e. They turned themselves in due to feelings of guilt. They were not arrested;

f. The punishment was carried out at Kajang Prison at 10 am on 9 February. 2 of them were caned 6 times whilst the other received 4 strokes. One of them was released last Saturday after serving one month prison sentence. Another will be released in a few days and the third will be released in June.

g. The Home Minister was quoted to have said that based on his meeting with the 3 women, he found that they have repented and they accept the punishment meted out although the caning did not cause any injuries. He hopes that the punishment would not be misconstrued to the extent that it smears the sanctity of Islam. The punishment is to educate and make them realise that even though they have strayed, they still can come back to the straight path and build a better life for themselves.

Fair Punishment?

The question that needs to be asked is whether based on the facts as we know it, the imposition of the caning commensurate the crime that was committed. Based on the section in the Act, it is difficult to see how the Judge could have imposed such a hefty sentence for first time offenders. They were caned and imprisoned.

Section 23 of the Act provides,

23. Sexual intercourse out of wedlock.

(1) Any man who performs sexual intercourse with a woman who is not his lawful wife shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be liable to a fine not exceeding five thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to whipping not exceeding six strokes or to any combination thereof.

(2) Any woman who performs sexual intercourse with a man who is not her lawful husband shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be liable to a fine not exceeding five thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to whipping not exceeding six strokes or to any combination thereof.

(3) The fact that a woman is pregnant out of wedlock as a result of sexual intercourse performed with her consent shall be prima facie evidence of the commission of an offence under subsection (2) by that woman.

(4) For the purpose of subsection (3), any woman who gives birth to a fully developed child within a period of six qamariah months from the date of her marriage shall be deemed to have been pregnant out of wedlock.

Based on subsection (2) above, if found guilty, the office is punishable by a fine not exceeding five thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to whipping not exceeding six strokes or to any combination thereof . The operative word there is ‘OR’. This means that the Judge can use his discretion based on the surrounding circumstances of the facts to choose the punishment to be imposed. Here, he chose to whip AND imprison.

Whipping is also the heaviest punishment under the syariah enactments of Wilayah Persekutuan. This can be seen in Section 133 of the Syariah Criminal Procedure (Federal Territories) Act 1997 [“Procedure Act”] which states,

133. Power to commute punishment.

The Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Mufti may. without the consent of the person sentenced, commute any one of the following sentences for any other mentioned after it, namely-

(a) whipping;

(b) imprisonment;

(c) fine.

Based on this section, in terms of ranking, the heaviest penalty would be whipping followed by imprisonment and the lightest being a fine. Here, there 3 women were sentenced with the heaviest punishment ie whipping. Perhaps the Judge can justify the same since one of the women has a child and is supporting her family and as such imprisonment may not be appropriate. However, all 3 women were also sentenced to imprisonment as well! They surrendered voluntarily and they were all repentant. Yet they are punished with the heaviest form of punishment? Is this the compassion in Islam?

Furthermore, every organisation and writer who is in support of the imposition of the caning take the line that whipping in Islam is to educate rather than injure or punish. If that was true, then why does the Procedure Act expressly provide that whipping is the most severe and heaviest penalty? If it was to educate, would it not be more appropriate for them to be subject to community service or be imposed a good behaviour bond (which is also provided for under section 129 of the Procedure Act) since they were first time offenders?

Another issue on the caning, according to one woman, it was fast and not painful. If it was fast and not painful and only to ‘educate’, then why cane when you take into account all the controversies surrounding the issue, in both the legal and social sense? All these factors seem to point to one direction, i.e. that it is a political manoeuvre and not an Islamic issue. It is a power issue for the government of the day to show its ‘physical’ Islamic credentials and also for the Syariah Courts to quietly and using backdoor means to raise its status to a level higher than what is provided for in the Federal Constitution.

Mitigation?

In the Procedure Act, there are a number of sections which allow the Court to use discretion to reduce the sentence meted out by taking into account personal factors of the accused. It allows the Court to mitigate the sentence impose on the accused.

Its useful to repeat that, from the media reports, the 3 women were not repeat offenders, they surrendered voluntarily and were not arrested and they have repented. Section 129 of the Procedure Act states,

129. First offenders.

(1) When any person not being a youthful offender has been convicted of any offence punishable with imprisonment before any Court, if it appears to such Court that regard being had to the character, antecedents, age, health or mental condition of the offender or to the trivial nature of the offence or to any extenuating circumstances under which the offence was committed it is expedient that the offender be released on probation of good conduct, the Court may, instead of sentencing him at once to any punishment, direct that he be released on his entering into a bond with sureties and during such period as the Court may direct to appear and receive judgment if and when called upon and in the meantime be of good behaviour.

For the 17 year old woman, section 128 of the Procedure Act provides,

128. Youthful offenders.

(1) When any youthful offender is convicted before any Court of any offence punishable by fine or imprisonment, such Court shall instead of awarding any term of imprisonment in default of payment of the fine or passing a sentence of imprisonment-

(a) order such offender to be discharged after due admonition if the Court shall think fit; or

(b) order such offender to be delivered to his parent or to his guardian or nearest adult relative or to such other person, as the Court shall designate, on such parent, guardian, relative or other person executing a bond with a surety, as the Court may require, that he will be responsible for the good behaviour of the offender for any period not exceeding twelve months or. without requiring any person to enter into any bond, make an order in respect of such offender ordering him to be of good behaviour for any period not exceeding two years and containing any directions to such offender in the nature of the condition referred to in paragraphs 130(a), (b) and (c) which the Court shall think fit to give”.

It is clear from the Procedure Act that there are sections which empower the Judge to reduce the sentence meted out. The question is that why impose such a heavy penalty? The sections above also demonstrates that the argument that the caning is to be considered as an ‘education’ rather than punishment also does not hold water especially in view of the fact that whipping is considered as a punishment heavier than imprisonment. Here, the 3 women were sentenced to caning AND imprisonment!

The manner in which the punishment was carried out and the eventual disclosure to the Malaysian public raises suspicion. There are many unanswered questions with no answers. Are these 3 women collateral damage in order for certain organisations to flex its muscles or for the government to demonstrate its physical ‘Islamic’ credentials? Why do we not hear of heavy punishment being meted out to errant husbands who desert their wives or fail to pay maintenance? The imbalance in handing out sentences for offences under the Syariah enactments does not help to counter the negative perception toward the Syariah institutions in Malaysia.

However, unfortunately, they also do not like to be criticized. Every criticism or question posed is usually met with ‘labelling’, the usual would be, ‘anti-Islam’, ‘liberal Islam’ and many others. The other common retort would be that the critic does not understand the intricacies of Islam and the worse would be that the critic is questioning God’s law which is the syariah (despite the fact that the enactments were drafted by draftsmen based on their interpretation of Islamic laws).

It is frustrating that whilst they argue that those who oppose such punishment do not understand Islam, they do not take the steps to respond in an intellectual manner based on factual arguments. Until now, despite the screams and cries from various women organizations on the manner in which the Syariah Courts treats women, we have no real cogent and clear response to the same by organizations like JAKIM or the Syarie Lawyers Association. For example, lets look at the some sections from the Islamic Family Law (Federal Territories) Act 1984 [“Family Act”],

126. Desertion of wife.

Any person who, having been ordered by the Court to resume cohabitation with his wife, wilfully fails or neglects to comply with the order commits an offence and shall be punished with a fine not exceeding one thousand ringgit or with imprisonment not exceeding six months or with both such fine and imprisonment.

127. Ill-treatment of wife.

Any person who ill-treats his wife or cheats his wife of her property commits an offence and shall be punished with a fine not exceeding one thousand ringgit or with imprisonment not exceeding six months or with both such fine and imprisonment.

128. Failure to give proper justice to wife.

Any person who fails to give proper justice to his wife according to Hukum Syara' commits an offence and shall be punished with a fine not exceeding one thousand ringgit or with imprisonment not exceeding six months or with both such fine and imprisonment.

The sections above deal with mistreatment by the husband on the wife. It involves a wrong committed on third parties i.e. the wife and also the children from the marriage which may lead to negative social issues. However, such offences carry penalties which are far less harsh than personal moral crimes such as sex outside wedlock. Is this fairness? Is it not justified for women organisations to criticise the state of affairs when it seems biased in favour of the man? Perhaps, rather than embarking on sensationalist punishments, it would be better for the Islamic justice organisations to study the various other enactments to find ways to be more ‘fair’ and ‘just’?

What seems to be more and more apparent when the issue is analysed in greater depth is that it has again been carried out as a manoeuvre in the political chess game. It has nothing to do with the education of the ummah or to stem social ills. The 3 women are mere pawns in the game for political power in this country. The saddest part is that Islam has again been abused in the race for power and votes.

* This is a translated version of an earlier post in Bahasa Malaysia entitled "Isu Sebatan Wanita - Oslam atau Politik?" by Shaikh Saleem. This translated version is done by Shaikh himself.

Explanation Petroleum Claims Issues

All states including Kelantan same class at the Petroleum Development Act 1974. All states that sign the agreement with Petronas in 1975/1976 will receive cash payments of 5% of the value of petroleum found in the state.

Here are answers to the issues is the claim;

1. What is the term referred to the Petroleum Development Act 1974 on payment of oil and gas?

Terms that apply for the purposes of payment is "cash payment" of 5% and the word "royalty" is not used in any terms the Act.2. What qualifications state governments to get 5% cash payment as mentioned in the agreement between Petronas and state government year 1975/1976?

Oil or gas wells must be located within the boundaries of state land and the territorial waters of the state as far as 3 nautical miles measured from low tide level (the Emergency (Essential Powers) No.7 Year 1969).
3. Is Kelantan state government or any state governments in Peninsular entitled to claim a cash payment from Petronas oil?

Kelantan State or any state government in the peninsula is not entitled to because of all oil and gas wells that produce results in the peninsula at present outside the territorial waters of the state more than 3 nautical miles. Therefore any results obtained outside the state waters beyond 3 nautical miles are owned by the Federal Government.
4. What is the position of Sabah and Sarawak on the issue of royalty payments?

Before 1974, the state government of Sabah and Sarawak already has a place of their own rights through royalty agreements and the effective operation of the Continental Shelf Act 1966. It is a historical and current privilege recognized joined Malaysia in 1963.

5. What is the payment Wang Ehsan?

Ehsan is a contribution of money or assistance is channeled discretion based
Federal Government to states including Kelantan. This contribution is outside the scope / jurisdiction of the Petroleum Development Act 1974 and agreements signed between Petronas and state governments in tahun1975/1976. This assistance is provided solely on the awareness and responsibility based on concerns the Federal Government to the welfare state and people.
6. Why Wang Ehsan offered by the Federal Government to the state of Kelantan only amounted to about RM 20 million?

This provision gives the Federal Government on policies relating to ehsan gas produced in Federal waters. Kelantan State Government have no rights in the area because it is outside the waters 3 nautical miles.
7. What position statement from the former Chairman of Petronas, YB Tengku Hamzah Rezaleigh that royalties should be paid to the state of Kelantan from petroleum products obtained from outside state waters and the disputed provision of Wang Ehsan.

Press YB Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, Gua Musang member of parliament should be seen as his personal opinion alone. Any decision taken regarding the right to royalty payments made based legal provisions and related agreements signed between Petronas and state governments.

YB Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah had explained that the government can not be disputed Terengganu Pas Wang Ehsan position because of money channeled for this even though the name of oil royalties, the state is not right.

He also stated during the Petronas has established a state noted that no pun in Peninsular entitled to the oil found in the area outside the "territory" they (BERNAMA - 1 November 2000)

Although YB Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah has changed
holdings at this time, the law remains unchanged. Citizens and states must respect the laws of the country.

8. Are opposition leader informed about the rights of state governments in this regard?

Based on the provisions of existing legislation, opposition leader is aware of the state government have no right to any cash payments or royalties related to petroleum products which explored outside the territorial waters of the state. Because of this, opposition leaders had tried to propose amendments proposed Petroleum Development Act 1974 in Parliament in December 2009 that then.

With the Leader of the Opposition was aware that their own government Kelantan State no right over any oil or gas wells within the Federation.

Not All Issues Can Be Political Capital - Zainul Arifin

Attacks on houses of worship us, no matter to what religion even, is a suspected large for us. If first we may be worried too, now we do not. We as a country and determination to overcome alleged attempt this.

We do not even change the way we live. We go out to work and school, we went shopping and eating out and walk. We can do so because we do not completely agree with the evil actions, the main goal is to divided us and create distrust among our fellow. We do not welcome such sales rogue-rogue, but we do not directly messy or panic.

Cowardly action that, if we attempt to create panic, cause we will take in pawn our values. We may no longer entirely mixed with different religious friends, and spirit of compromise and community will fade.

They are trying to test us, God used words when facing Christians, whether the spirit of nationhood we are still strong.



They, and their supporters, just want to cause commotion, or, more terrible again, we are divided. Notwithstanding our political ideology, what can we find from the creation of evil? Who can gain the water cloudy?

However, I am excited with the joint statement from the Youth wing of the Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat, who said:

"We believe this issue is beyond religion, politics and race. When there are attempts threaten our unity and our identity as Malaysians, led by young people willing to set aside political differences to defend national harmony. "

"We are also grateful to many politicians, especially from the opposition, who chose not to accuse the government as the source of the problem. It may also difficult to fight the instinct, but their actions for not pointing fingers very encouraging. But not all do so. "

Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim writes in the regional newspapers:

"Attack the church burned recently showed what is wrong how people look at the Malaysian non-Muslim, attacks resulting from the use of controversial words God of Christians Malaysia, .. since then, a tense situation boil, mainly caused by some provocation politician is not responsible, mainstream media and a group of non-governmental organizations that their membership and leadership related to the government party, UMNO. "

How reality compared Youth wing joint statement, the state does not want to argue against political sessions and avoided.

Why condemn the outside? Woe is us at the time in which Muslims regarded by the cynical world, now he kind of government reflect not only weak in handling the incident destroy our houses, but may also be responsible,

He also said that Malaysia's international reputation also decreased since Datuk Seri Najib Razak becomes the Prime Minister with the creation of lists such as penalty strokes to Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno, the incidence of protest construction of the temple, head of cattle in Shah Alam, treatment is not good to the renegade, and fatwas prevent Muslims adopt yoga.



Country's image would have been affected by the above, but what their relation with the leadership of the country now? Is he wants Najib told the court how to conduct court, or tell how scholars think, or tell how protesters should act?



Most politicians forget that people know they are acting in the interests of politics, what can be done by winning contest. PDS versus normal condemned, even, is better than the campaign tells people what he can do.

However there are some things that do not need political, and this issue is one of them. Politicize something just muddy conditions. That was a political opportunist.

This is not the first time houses were attacked, and it's not the last. What they want is to inculcate hatred and interfere with our ability to shock-befriend fellow citizens. This time they failed.

It seems, we are always tired with the political negative. We do not want politics to be divided and we are not uniting us. Large-enlarge political differences between us, rather than the existing equation. We are tired with the hawk dangers and not give hope.

Anwar Ibrahim - Conspiracy number two


Also revealed on Wednesday 25th June 2008, the day before the last sexual assault on Thursday morning, Saiful had met with high-ranking police officer Senior Assistant Commissioner SAC Rodwan Mohd Yusof (iti time Deputy Director of Criminal Investigation Department of the Royal Malaysia Police Force, now police chief Malacca) on the Concorde Hotel, Kuala Lumpur in the room numbered 619.


Sivarasa Rasiah


Only eleven years since Anwar Ibrahim was sacked from deputy prime minister, he received a slap to the allegations as olahnya sodomy and corruption charges (deviation of power). He faced two trials with the whole world condemned the trial as unfair and motivation of certain political parties. As a result he spent six years in detention at the Sungai Buloh prison, confined alone for restraint only allowed to meet with family members and attorneys only. Finally, former Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamad received punishment commensurate with heavy hearts were forced to retire in October 2003. Anwar dibebas and then released on 2nd day of September 2004 on the final appellate court in cases reflected changing judgments.

Now the nightmare begins again. On July 16, 2008, Anwar was arrested on charges of sodomy which new cases, after a report made by Saiful Bukhari police, assistant rank low in the office on June 28, 2008. Anwar said the accusation was, once again politically motivated, as the latest attempt to block his political career is back kegemilangannya risen dramatically. Many people inside and outside the country agree with this assessment.



This latest case just re-running the old script with a new actor - the script now also features episodes of political interference, corruption and abuse of officials in the Attorney General's office and the police, evidence of fraud emerged from a political conspiracy to stop Anwar outstanding political career.

Case wonder who really strange


There are many facts of the allegations made Saiful and follow the horn already in the public knowledge. Facts speak for itself. Soon it shows how bonds are not cases of imagined this, but seeks to topple Anwar.

Polisnya Saiful claimed in the report dated 28 June 2008 at Kuala Lumpur Hospital ( "HKL") that Anwar sodomized him at noon Thursday, June 26th, 2008 at a condominium in Bukit Damansara. Saiful talked to the police in her statement that claimed he was attacked by force of 8 to 9 times without a willingness by Anwar himself during the two months that passed. In the report polisnya two days later on June 28, 2008, he claimed that this incident really happened without sodomy willingness hearts. Saiful this story raise suspicion why he as so-called "victim" of forced sodomy 8 to 9 times without willingness hearts, for two months but did not make any complaints to the authorities. During that time he was in relation to the ordinary Anwar and all staff in the office of Anwar Ibrahim.

Also revealed on Wednesday 25th June 2008, the day before the last sexual assault on Thursday morning, Saiful had met with high-ranking police officer Senior Assistant Commissioner SAC Rodwan Mohd Yusof (iti time Deputy Director of Criminal Investigation Department of the Royal Malaysia Police Force, now police chief Malacca) on the Concorde Hotel, Kuala Lumpur in the room numbered 619. When reporters asked about this meeting, Rodwan not give any comments. Rodwan has played an important role with the police force in the case of Anwar first year 1998/99. Rodwan known for its role Anwar took blood samples for testing DNA without keel according to law. He is also famous for its alleged effect of putting the DNA imagined the essence of the mattress to court. During the first trial in 1998, DNA evidence can not be shared even judge Augustine Paul had a clear bias to help remove evidence from the prosecution's case.

General also has revealed "the victim" was also met with Prime Minister today (then still the Deputy Prime Minister) a few days before the alleged incident that occurred. What is more appealing about this Najib exposure initially denied meeting with Saiful to the media, but later admitted, explaining that the meeting took place because Saiful (failure of the university, not finished studying) asking Najib for scholarship assistance. After it was Najib told the media that Anwar sodomized Saiful and in meeting Saiful looked quite traumatic.

Saiful behavior after allegedly forced sodomy on Thursday also raised a question mark. Morning next day, Saiful to Anwar's office as usual. He did not complain to anyone and normal.Pada appear in the next petangnya he attended events organized by Anwar Ibrahim Anwar Club at home, in which Anwar himself was also present. There he helps serve coffee to a dozen people in attendance, shows no signs of fear or panic, he could stand up and sit down without showing signs of discomfort.

On Saturday next, the next afternoon, approximately 2 pm, Saiful decided to go to private hospitals Medical Center Islam (Pusrawi) in Jalan Tun Razak. In it, he complained to Dr.. Osman that he felt pain in the hole duburnya a few days and she seems to feel like there is material "plastic" is entered. Protoskopi inspection (using a tool that aims to examine protoskop end hole anus) by Dr. Osman showed no signs of penetration or entry and normal anal end of intestine and rectum.

Completion inspection, he told Dr.. Osman that he sodomized by VIP (nobles) and Saiful has been advised to seek inspection at government hospitals. Although only HKL located across the street, Saiful setangah takes two hours to get there. In HKL, he reported that he was sodomized, he was later examined by the three specialist doctors, which is not a common procedure. The three doctors are in their official report mentions, "there is no summary results of clinical examination can be sure that the proposed penetration into the anal hole ..." once again strengthen the conclusion that it made Dr.. Osman.

None of the investigators with the intricate nature will understand that sodomy will not charge to any medical evidence in that straightforward. No one sane will continue investigating the prosecution's case. Here we look at things that otherwise occur. Team investigators earnest, though the medical evidence shows there is no penetration of the anus hole. Hasad malicious nature of the survey reinforced the existence of political motives behind their actions.

Investigation of this case be continued even though the results of medical examination report has been submitted immediately to the police investigators. Specimens taken from Saiful with pengelap raise suspicion because it takes two days to reach the laboratory to be analyzed. Now we know that the prosecution will rely on DNA evidence in an attempt to prove Anwar Saiful meliwat involved in the action without kerelaannya.

How can a parent with back pain may force a jejaka high and robust age of 24 years, an interesting question can be answered to the political observers throughout this trial.

Other interesting question is strong medical evidence in the state of clinical examination could not find even to suggest penetration, lack try Wibawa report showed that DNA found in the DNA Anwar Saiful anal hole. It should be noted that DNA evidence is very easy to be added or tailored-add, especially if their work-the design, add proof is done by the same investigators in the first trial in 1998.

Examples of evidence that imagined to impose Anwar

This is not the first time, cases involving Anwar evidence to the phenomenon of the fictional show. Cases 1998 and 1999 with full recognition of the planned creation, evidence that DNA imagined and concealment of evidence by police and the senior prosecutor involved.

Some examples can be given. Gani Patail is a Senior Attorney in the case of Anwar in 1998 was unveiled at this year as they invented the medical evidence in the form of medical reports. It is an investigation regarding the assault on Anwar on the night of 20 September 1998 when Anwar was attacked by a violent Rahim Noor. After Anwar black-eye view of the world, there is pressure and then followed with the police investigation. Investigating officers in the case, Dato Mat Zain have confirmed this in his letter to SPRM (Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission) dated 15 April. According to the letter, Gani Patail earnestly concoct evidence medical reports with the help of Musa Hassan (now Chief of Police) in an attempt to try to move the injury done by Anwar himself. Dr. Mahathir then announced to the public about the injury done by Anwar himself.

Formation of the evidence against Anwar designs also occur in cases and those others. Gani Patail terbabis threatening Nallakaruppan charged with punishments bunuhbagi forcing himself to give false evidence against Anwar. This is disclosed in the sworn declaration made Nallakaruppan lawyer, Manjeet Singh Dhillon is a witness who directly threatened by Gani Patail attempt to obtain false evidence against Anwar.

Federal Court Judge in the case of Steve Shim zainur Zakaria versus PP [2001] 3 CLJ have to state that the application to cancel Anwar Gani Patail and Azahar as right as Attorney threatens their involvement in the execution Nallakaruppan to obtain the desired proof design:

"In this situation, what he (" Anwar ") are not considered appropriate on the basis of it is beyond reasonable doubt to make a complaint that the actions the Attorney General (Gani Patail) during a meeting on October 2, 1998 in an attempt to force them to Nalla-proof design to complete allegations against Anwar for sexual offense case to another? "

But Judge Augustine Paul did not act to cancel Kelayan Gani Patail and Azahar. Even Augustine finds advocate Anwar, Zakaria zainur guilty as insulting the court filing because the application feasibility of the cancellation and dropping 3-month prison sentence. Gani Patail continue to climb the summit might be Attorney General. Azahar is a High Court judge. Malaysia Boleh!

Sukma, adoptive brother Anwar, arrested in September 1998 and detained without any communication with lawyers and families for 14 days. Applicant to meet with the lawyer rejected Sukma. He was tortured mentally and physically until he made confession to the Anwar sodomy. Police officers named in the judgments of the Court of Appeal as responsible for the torture is Musa Hassan, now police chief of Malaysia. Physical examination by Dr.. Zahari Noor showed no evidence of penetration - the report is known by the Prosecutor who conceals knowledge of the court, at Sukma pleaded "guilty" only based on recognition that it was forced. Sukma family lawyer appointed to represent children are not allowed to speak after guamnya argued by the prosecutor (Gani Patail and Yusuf Zainal Abiden).

Court of Appeal in the judgments written in June 2006 in the case of Sukma Darmawan Sasmitaat Madja v PP [2007] 4 CLJ 697] state:

"Here we have cases of illicit conduct with the prosecution intentionally conceal evidence that memenangkan the defense. There is no longer the case ketidak adilan is straightforward, when the guilty confession allegedly obtained by illegal means pressure on the law."

Arrest and detention of Dr. Munawar Anees is also similar to that happen to Sukma, he can be detained without relation to lawyers and families, were tortured and forced to make a false confession to sodomy with Anwar. Unfortunate for him, all the court not appealable as a judge memenangkan kesnya.Hakim-Low Hop Bing J in the Court of Appeal judges with Zaki Tun Azmi (now Chief Justice), Zulkefli Makinudin J. and Nik Hashim J in the Federal Court has ensured the application Dr. Munawar to get justice and allow the case reopened was terminated. Dr. Munawar ensure they are not able to disclose pahitnya experience in 1998 at the hands of the police, prosecution and courts in a new trial. Application to counterbalance the decision of the Supreme Court has declined recently on 28 December 2009 by the Federal Court panel which comprises Arifin Zakaria J., J. Raus Sharif and Mohd Ghazali Mohd Yusuf.

Clear friction between the treatment in the case of Sukma and Munawar case at the appeal to the court for a more bright and clear enough. In any criminal legal system, when challenged on the grounds that recognition dilakukaan without volunteers, the accused automatically awarded the opportunity to hear viva voce (by witnesses) in connection with kesukarelaannya. EXCELLENCE legislation has become very important because when a guilty confession recorded by without real recognition. Simply disesalkan highest court in Malaysia do not see the basic principles of justice is the judicial system. Through these actions, they confirmed that serious crimes committed by police and the Attorney involved when he was arrested, detained and tortured to obtain confession and false imprisonment for six months only to worsen as the name of Anwar in connection with the relationship perkenalan.

Hasad malicious conspiracy in this case now


Gani Patail Attorney General is now in Malaysia. Hassan Musa, head of the police force. Both names, specifically Gani Patail, was unveiled by Mat Zain as they create false evidence, a serious crime, to charge Anwar in the investigation into "black-eye" Anwar said.

Investigating the case is now under control of the police received instructions from Hassan Musa. Hasad investigation into enough real evil when Masked and armed police arrest Anwar approximately 1 pm at his home on July 16, 2008 - this occurred about two and a half weeks after Saiful made a report. Capturing that actually do not need to be made directly. This is because the lawyer Anwar is escorted her to police headquarters in Kuala Lumpur hours to 2 pm the same day to attend an appointment that had been arranged beforehand and agreed to by the police officer assigned to record the statement Anwar.

However, he was arrested he was such a criminal is on the run. Anwar was arrested overnight in the lock-up, once again it is not necessary and quite clearly shows Hasad evil. He was forced to sleep on cold cement floor, adding burukkan the old part back injuries. The reason given for the police to detain Anwar overnight is because they need to resolve to take his statement - but to demand his return at the promised time has been denied. Now it became very clear that Anwar was arrested overnight dilokap as an attempt to mendapatlan DNA samples from his body.

Allegation reinforced by Saiful Saiful took part in the event "lakhnat oath" at the National Mosque Kuala Lumpur on July 15, 2008 in the presence of Ustaz Ramlang bin Porigi, one attack priests there. Later in August, Ustaz Ramlang disclose that he was directed by the Head of Islamic Religious Department Kuala Lumpur Federal Territory (JAIWP) Dato Che Mat Che Ali bin to attend as a witness when the oath took place. Because he makes public disclosure regarding this matter, Ustaz Ramlang later changed to the "financial" (JAIWP). A few months later he imposed disciplinary action.

Political intervention is also shown in Sumitro handling complaints filed by Anwar on Saiful to the JAIWP on July 9 (Sumitro offense is under sharia law for giving a statement defamatory of other people, particularly in relation to sexual offenses). JAIWP enforcement departments have completed the investigation within a few months and has been recording a statement from Anwar, Saiful and relevant witnesses. So to this day still has not declared JAIWP no offense committed Saiful. At the same time, there is no prosecution against Saiful made the attempt. JAIWP officials were directed by the Federal Minister responsible for the affairs of religion not to take any action against Saiful, the case reflected on the ground still held out. This is legal because both courts are separate and independent and once again it shows political interference.

Hasad evil and biased in the prosecution; to hold documents from the defense; trial unfair

Serious attention should be given to Hasad evil and partisanship in the prosecution. Gani Patail signed the transfer certificate of Anwar case the Sessions Court to the High Court. Yusuf Zainal Abiden, Senior Attorney in the prosecution team is now also actively involved in the case of the prosecution case Anwar and Sukma in 1998. There are concerns by providing partisanship and mala fide or malicious prosecution indicated in cases before this, that Anwar will not get a fair hearing from the Right Attorney prosecute him now.

Some malicious action in question has shown the search documents and evidence in the case this time. Application beterusan Anwar lawyer from the line to get the appropriate documents to prepare defense witnesses such as kenyataa Saiful and other witnesses did not entertained by the Senior Attorney. Anwar then apply this document to the judge hearing the High Court. Judge Zabidin Mohd Diah Anwar has allowed this application. The Prosecutor also appealed, which led the Court of Appeal judgments aside the High Court. Anwar appeal to the Supreme Court declined on Friday, January 28, 2010. A decision is not surprising, to see the political stance taken by the judges of the Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Munawar.

Facts show Anwar appeal to the Federal Court against a number of important documents relating to production is still pending. However, the judge hearing the High Court on December 6, 2009 in a state of depression appear to set the trial date earlier and set the trial began on January 25 for a month. The same judge had said that this year's trial date will not be set until about obtaining the documents is determined by the appeals court level to the top more.

Justice Anwar faced prospective trial that has been questioned with the disclaimer document important to prepare the defense. In the criminal trial in nearly the entire legal system, the accused will be given, before the hearing, all witness statements and all documents issued by all the witnesses involved. This procedure is to ensure justice to all parties, and prevent trial delays. Despite the provisions of existing laws, but Anwar trial will be run as how long the attacks and ambushed submission of proof. Detailed particulars of each case and the prosecution of many vital documents will be seen first by the defense during the trial only lasted. It puts the accused and their lawyers belanya in pressure that is not fair.

Political conspiracy

Key to the trial can be viewed with bermotif political actions by the prosecution and the interests of the parties involved, specifically Gani Patail (now Attorney General) and Musa Hassan (now Chief of Police) and the Prime Minister today.

Pakatan Rakyat and Anwar has been criticized their habisa death in and outside parliament - Attorney-General Gani Patail with criminal behavior in its own investigation in the case of "black-eye", failure to ensure that prosecution for many cases of serious corruption, in particular associated with crime and corruption exposed in the VK Lingam video clip; also the relationship of the claims credible participation KPN Musa Hassan in connection with criminal actions rasuahnya the heads of groups such as gangsterism BK Tan and Goh Cheng Poh.

Anwar open criticism of the Prime Minister's participation in the corruption case purchase Sukhoi jets and Scorpene submarines by the Ministry of Defense has become a common record. Anwar also repeatedly urged Najib to allow independent investigation of the allegations credible clear his name and his involvement in the murder of his wife Rosmah famous Mongolian model Altantuya Shaaribuu.

Internet blogs are reporting evidence declaration bersumpaj made by private investigator Balasubramaniam that Altantuya told him that says he has a personal relationship with Najib connection with the negotiation and purchase of weapons and about how the same DSP Musa Safiri, police officers escort AWI plays a role in the arrest and pelenyapan Altantuya. Moses Safiri but not called as a witness in the case of Altantuya's murder trial.

Anwar in July of 2008 and in February last year also filed a police report about Musa Hassan and Gani Patail over their role in their copyright-evidence against him in the investigation of cases of "black-eye" in 1998. The report also claimed that they abetting filing a false police report on the night of 20 September 1998 in connection with the arrest of Anwar in his house in Bukit Damansara. None of these reports result in prosecution even though a former judge of the Supreme Court opinion Gani guilty in the case of criminal investigation "black-eye".

Misuse of public institutions such as the police force, the Office of the Attorney General, Judiciary and other institutions such as the ever happening in 1998, taking place once again with this latest case. It is not a simple criminal case. Diperjudikan what is now the case is the use of persecution and false as a political weapon to stop the progress of Anwar Ibrahim and Pakatan Rakyat political movement that dipimpinnya. A movement that threatens the existence of progress and future government and Barisan Nasional leaders.
Click Here! Click Here! Click Here!

Search This Blog