Authors share the same flight with the opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim from Manila to Kuala Lumpur on the way home after attending a national task at the end of January.
The presence of Anwar have a very extensive coverage by the print media, electronic media and cyber media there. Status reports and news published on the cover of many local newspapers.
During the two days was reported in Manila, Anwar opportunity to speak at the University of Malcolm Hall. He also had the opportunity to meet with former Philippines President Joseph Estrada who is referred by the media there as a close friend and the boat with him.
In addition to Estrada a meeting held at the Manila Polo Club, Makati, Anwar also met with his political associates of Benigno Aquino Jr.. A lot is said by Anwar while he was there, as quoted from the report of the local newspapers. Of the issues on the wind of political change and democracy in Pakistan until the cases of sodomy that is exposed.
Anwar as reported claims, sodomy charges on it is a political conspiracy to divert attention from government corruption cases. He also said the sodomy charge was unfair and illusory, and added that the lack of evidence will deny conviction on it.
But Anwar's claim that the alleged lack of evidence does not reflect the actual fact he is facing trial in court today.
If true then the lack of evidence of alleged sodomy, why Anwar seem so afraid of the court and avoid a variety of reasons? Is not the 'lack of evidence' that Anwar will be released easily, and this case can be resolved quickly?
Beyond the issue of sodomy, the other things that can be evaluated from the action kecenderugan Anwar is that he finds support in other countries.
In China, South Korea and Japan, for example, the attitude of leaders of the drugs out of sympathy with such a review is not dignity, turned back and betraying the country.
In the case of Anwar, the Philippines is the country's second visit to Anwar in the period of about three months after Australia in December last year. While Manila has not officially expressed support for Anwar, but the support is clearly there.
It is possible, there are those in Manila later will follow the footsteps of about 58 members of the Australian Parliament urges government to drop Anwar sodomy case. Recent, Anwar claimed that the support and attention from the U.S., Turkey and Qatar on the case reflected that.
It should be a leader who has held the position of number two in the country, Anwar is very familiar with the legal and political question. Let any reason whatsoever, the legislative process can not be tainted or influenced by political decisions.
The action had the support of other countries is like denying the law of the country. More unfortunate, it was done on the basis of personal interest. Not just for Saiful Bukhari is a human dwarf to deal with Anwar's action in this case clearly make full use of political power is in him.
How so Anwar relations with countries such as Indonesia, Flipina, Australia, Turkey and many more can not be denied by anyone. In fact, Washington himself more comfortable dealing with Anwar. But what about Saiful? Leaders of countries that want to hear the pressures he faced?
Because it is not fair for these countries accused of sodomy is a political agenda that the government wanted to prevent Anwar's political ambitions. From a broader perspective, the act of seeking foreign support is only open to foreign intervention in the issue of sovereignty in this country. It can cause loss of national sovereignty and the decision of which direction the country will be determined by foreign powers and not the
people of this country itself. We should refer to and learn from the experiences of other countries in this issue. Examples of the simplest, as described by international observers and security, Mohamad Faisol Keling, the U.S. intervention in the internal affairs of Pakistan. The country now had to submit and be "donkey" to the implementation of U.S. policy.
Faisol Mohamad who is also a lecturer at the College of Law, Government and International Relations at the University of Utara Malaysia (UUM) added that there were people in the country to be confused with the promotion of human rights by the U.S..
This also directly pawn security and national sovereignty to foreign powers. While he said the U.S. itself is the worst country in the records of human rights and ignore the values of humanity.
Mohamad Faisol added, and the country's dependence on U.S. allies including hand power to manage the internal affairs such as the fate of the whole people to submit to the U.S.. This means people will lose authority over as we had experienced before 1957. The reality of foreign powers will make ligh other countries to their advantage.
Thus, whether parties are aware of their actions as being mortgage fate, stability, peace and prosperity? What we need to understand, human rights grounds only when the goal is to dominate a country that is under the index and results.
Wealth, prosperity, and stability of the country will be in the hands of "colonialism" and the people will continue to invade through a puppet government. ''This is the price to be paid to actions that support community groups like this, "he said.
The involvement of the U.S. and its allies could be addressed by the Malaysian government should provide a comprehensive explanation to the country. For Faisol Mohamad, the government should insist on the establishment to carry out justice based on the practices of their own country and not by the unseen from the outside.
Specificity is based on the method of justice that is based on valid legislation. At the same time he said, the government also needs to deliver and promote the integrity of the supremacy of law in Pakistan in the eyes of the world either through bilateral or multilateral.
This includes the time to attend the conference, through the embassy and so on. This method is very effective despite the fact that the U.S. and its allies at the time denounced loudly and Malaysia.
''But in this case, the government must ensure that the process is fair and does not involve political influences. This is to convince people of the crimes committed. This action would be to bring the offenders punished, and defend the oppressed, " he said. - Utusan Malaysia
No comments:
Post a Comment